Divorce laws vary significantly by state, which means that if you are considering filing for divorce in either Minnesota or North Dakota, it is crucial to understand the key differences between the two jurisdictions. While both states follow equitable distribution principles and no-fault divorce laws, their procedures, requirements, and legal nuances differ. In this article, we will explore the primary differences in divorce laws between Minnesota and North Dakota, helping you better understand what to expect in each state.

1. Residency Requirements

Minnesota:

Minnesota requires that at least one spouse must have resided in the state for a minimum of 180 days (approximately six months) before filing for divorce. This means that you cannot file for divorce immediately after moving to the state; you must establish residency first.

North Dakota:

North Dakota has a similar residency requirement but with a slight variation. A spouse must have lived in the state for at least six months before filing. However, if a spouse has been a resident for less than six months, they can still file, but the divorce will not be finalized until they meet the six-month requirement.

Key Takeaway:

Both states require a six-month residency period before finalizing a divorce, but Minnesota requires residency before filing, whereas North Dakota allows you to file but not finalize until you meet the requirement.

2. Grounds for Divorce

Minnesota:

Minnesota is a no-fault divorce state, meaning that you do not need to prove wrongdoing by either party to file for divorce. The only legally recognized ground for divorce is that the marriage has suffered an irretrievable breakdown with no chance of reconciliation.

North Dakota:

North Dakota allows both no-fault and fault-based divorce. A no-fault divorce can be granted on the grounds of irreconcilable differences, similar to Minnesota. However, North Dakota also permits fault-based divorce under specific grounds, including:

• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Willful neglect or desertion
• Habitual intemperance (e.g., alcohol or drug abuse)
• Conviction of a felony

Key Takeaway:

Minnesota only allows no-fault divorces, while North Dakota gives spouses the option to pursue either no-fault or fault-based divorce. A fault-based divorce in North Dakota may impact alimony or property division decisions.

3. Property Division

Minnesota:

Minnesota follows the equitable distribution model, meaning that the court will divide marital assets in a way that is fair but not necessarily equal. Courts consider factors such as:

• The length of the marriage
• Each spouse’s financial circumstances
• Contributions to the marriage (including homemaking and child-rearing)
• Economic misconduct (such as wasting marital assets)

North Dakota:

North Dakota also follows an equitable distribution system but with a key distinction. The state applies the “Ruff-Fischer Guidelines,” which take additional factors into account when dividing property, including:

• The respective ages and health of the spouses
• The earning ability of each party
• The conduct of the spouses during the marriage
• Any additional relevant factors impacting fairness

Key Takeaway:

While both states use equitable distribution, North Dakota courts may place more emphasis on fault-based behavior and other personal factors when deciding how to divide assets.

4. Spousal Maintenance (Alimony)

Minnesota:

Minnesota courts determine spousal maintenance (also known as alimony) based on factors such as:

• The financial resources of the spouse seeking support
• The standard of living during the marriage
• The time needed for the receiving spouse to become self-supporting
• The ability of the paying spouse to provide support while meeting their own financial needs

Spousal maintenance in Minnesota can be temporary, rehabilitative, or permanent, depending on the circumstances.

North Dakota:

North Dakota also awards spousal support but tends to favor temporary support rather than permanent alimony. The courts consider similar factors as Minnesota, but due to the influence of fault-based divorce, a spouse’s misconduct (such as adultery) may impact the amount and duration of alimony awarded.

Key Takeaway:

Both states provide spousal maintenance, but Minnesota is more likely to award long-term or permanent support, while North Dakota often prefers temporary or rehabilitative alimony and considers fault-based behavior in the decision.

Conclusion

While Minnesota and North Dakota share some commonalities in their divorce laws, they also have significant differences that can impact your case. Minnesota follows a stricter no-fault approach and has a more standardized approach to property division and spousal support, whereas North Dakota allows fault-based divorce, and considers misconduct in financial decisions.

If you are considering a divorce in either Minnesota or North Dakota, it is essential to consult with an experienced family law attorney who understands the specific laws in your jurisdiction. Legal guidance can help ensure that your rights are protected and that the divorce process proceeds as smoothly as possible. Contact the SW&L family law team at 701-297-2890 or email us at: info@swlattorneys.com.

The information contained in this article and on this website is for informational purposes only. Do not rely on information on this website as legal advice. Please refer to the full disclaimer here.